Comments on: Why is Barack Hussein Obama dangerous?yes or no, why?

By: rolandhadley

rolandhadley — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:30:35 +0000

When the republican party promotes policies that lead to deaths of thousands of Americans overseas, millions of Americans losing their homes, the economy being strangled by an overreliance on foreign oil, there’s really no argument to be made on the issues–Hence, instead the hatemongering and character assassination one sees in questions like this one.

By: Tim

Tim — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:24:32 +0000

One of the major points of contention I have with Obama is his tacit support for infanticide. That is, he will not support Born Alive legislation.

By: peacedude56

peacedude56 — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:31:13 +0000

The man is not smart enough not to go to a racist church. He sought and and established a relationship with his terrorist half brother. He has let a know terrorist Ayres host fundrasisers for him. Obviously he is not fit to be president.

By: Ronnie B

Ronnie B — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:16:50 +0000

There are dozens of real reasons that can all be read at

By: General H

General H — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:39:06 +0000

Yes he is dangerous. Just look, the “great uniter” has already divided the democratic party just think what he’s going to do to the country.

By: granddad1070@sbcglobal.net

granddad1070@sbcglobal.net — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:18:10 +0000

Obama is an egotistical nut case and he could be dangerous if things don’t go his way.

By: nickthaniel1

nickthaniel1 — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:02:27 +0000

Best to read Mad Magazine. What me worry?

By: B.Kevorkian

B.Kevorkian — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:44:33 +0000

BHO would be a risky choice for president, yes. He is inexperienced, but he is also charismatic. His young supporters seem ready to leave the race issue behind, but he, himself, clearly has not. World leaders are looking forward to him as President, but they have thier own agendas.

BHO could be the next JFK - or the next Jimmy Carter. That’s a risk. He could unite the country, or drag it down - possibly even both. McCain or Clinton would certainly be safer choices. They’d be much less likely to make catestrophic misstakes. They’d also be less likely to bring about substantive change for the better - or worse.

By: Kenneth J

Kenneth J — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:56:13 +0000

I agree with you on this issue 100% and I don’t think Obama is any where close to being the man JFK was.
Kennedy made his mistakes but that was do to no experience in politics.
He was a war hero and he loved America till Nov 22,1963 when he was assassinated in Dallas TX by Lee Harvey Oswald .

Obama is just to dangerous for us to take a chance on in this day and age considering the wars we are involved in now.

Obama doesn’t want to end the wars just the one in Iraq .

The one in Afghanistan is another story and then there’s Pakistani that he has said we will invade next.

Sorry but there just ain’t no way this man can ever be President of the USA.

No I won’t vote for him in Nov if he is the nominee either

By: Sherilynne B

Sherilynne B — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:52:23 +0000

He is by far the best candidate.