<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How can congress pass legislation allowing bankruptcy judges to change terms on already written mortgages?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/</link>
	<description>Quick Answers to Bankruptcy Questions &#38; Understand How Bankruptcy Laws Affect You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a_wood80</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>a_wood80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Because the democrats currently in control of congress don&#039;t believe we are smart enough to negotiate our own contracts.  While that may be true in some cases, the courts shouldn&#039;t be stepping in to alter them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the democrats currently in control of congress don&#8217;t believe we are smart enough to negotiate our own contracts.  While that may be true in some cases, the courts shouldn&#8217;t be stepping in to alter them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LorgSkyegon</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>LorgSkyegon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/#comment-694</guid>
		<description>1. Ex post facto means that Congress is prohibited from making a law retroactively punitive. i.e. Congress couldn&#039;t pass a law saying that drinking is illegal again and punish people who drank before the law went into effect. It affects criminal statutes only.

2. Congress is just being Congress. They know there is a large likelyhood that this can be overturned. They just want to tell peopl that they tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Ex post facto means that Congress is prohibited from making a law retroactively punitive. i.e. Congress couldn&#8217;t pass a law saying that drinking is illegal again and punish people who drank before the law went into effect. It affects criminal statutes only.</p>
<p>2. Congress is just being Congress. They know there is a large likelyhood that this can be overturned. They just want to tell peopl that they tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reconciled one</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>reconciled one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcy-help-resources.com/how-can-congress-pass-legislation-allowing-bankruptcy-judges-to-change-terms-on-already-written-mortgages/#comment-693</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

